DCPCR Moves SC Challenging Juvenile Justice Act

Story Highlights
  • The amendments to the JJ Act which can carry imprisonment upto 7 years.
  • DCPCR in its plea has sought direction to strike down the amendment as unconstitutional.
  • The amendment has the effect of treating offences committed against children.

New Delhi: The Delhi Commission for the Protection of Child Rights has now moved a plea in the Supreme Court, challenging an amendment made to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act last year which reclassifies serious offences (maximum imprisonment of three to seven years) against children as non-cognizable. The amendment that has been challenged makes changes to Section 86 of the Principal Act.

The offences that have been made non-cognizable through this change include the sale and procurement of children, exploitation of child employees, use of children for begging, use of children for vending, smuggling or trafficking narcotics, and cruelty committed upon children by staff of the Child Care Institutions (CCIs), among others.

The child rights body’s move to challenge the amendment in the Supreme Court comes a month after it and the state child rights bodies of Punjab, West Bengal, Chandigarh, and Rajasthan had written to the Union government seeking a Bill be tabled in Parliament to reverse this reclassification of offences. Without a reply or acknowledgment of the child rights bodies’ recommendations from the Union government since April 8th, the DCPCR has now filed a writ petition in the Apex court, seeking that the said amendment be declared unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

In their recommendation letter to the Union government, the five child rights bodies had pointed out that making these offences non-cognizable would make reporting them even more difficult – especially for children from marginalised communities, who are most often the victims of such crimes. They had said that this was because, under the Code of Criminal Procedure, the police cannot on its own register an FIR in non-cognizable offences.

They can only do so with an order from the concerned magistrate, thereby unnecessarily complicating the process of reporting such serious crimes. The child rights bodies also pointed out another anomaly in the amendment, according to which these crimes are serious enough to be non-bailable but not serious enough to be cognizable.

Related Articles

Back to top button